MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7036270445

Biochemical analyses of the wrch atypical rho family GTPases: Methods Enzymol.

2006· article· en· W7036270445 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueNPARC · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPhytochemistry and Biological Activities
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGTPaseCDC42Ras superfamilyEffectorFunction (biology)GTPase-activating proteinGuanine nucleotide exchange factorGTP-binding protein regulatorsSmall GTPase
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Rho family of GTPases comprises a major branch of the Ras superfamily of small GTPases. To date, at least 22 human members have been identified. However, most of our knowledge of Rho GTPase function comes from the study of the three classical Rho GTPases, RhoA, Rac1, and Cdc42. These Rho GTPases function as GDP/GTP-related binary switches that are activated by diverse extracellular signal-mediated stimuli. The activated GTPases then interact with downstream effectors to regulate cytoplasmic signaling networks that in turn regulate actin organization, cell cycle progression, and gene expression. Recently, studies have begun to explore the regulation and function of some of the lesser-known members of the Rho GTPase family. Wrch-1 (Wnt-regulated Cdc42 homolog-1) and the closely related Chp (Cdc42 homologous protein)/Wrch-2 protein comprise a distinct branch of the mammalian Rho GTPase family. Although both share significant sequence and functional similarities with Cdc42, Wrch proteins possess additional N- and C-terminal sequences that distinguish them from the classical Rho GTPases (Cdc42, RhoA, and Rac1). We have determined that Wrch-1 and Wrch2 exhibit unusual GDP/GTP binding properties and undergo posttranslational lipid modifications distinct from those of the classical Rho GTPases. In this chapter, we summarize our experimental approaches used to characterize the biochemical properties of these atypical Rho GTPases

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.098
Threshold uncertainty score0.471

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNPARCSame topicPhytochemistry and Biological ActivitiesFrench-language works237,207