MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7036287768

Cardiovascular and bone health outcomes in older people with subclinical hypothyroidism treated with levothyroxine: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2024· other· en· W7036287768 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSunderland Repository (University of Sunderland) · 2024
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLevothyroxineSubclinical infectionObservational studyOdds ratioConfidence intervalMeta-analysisBone healthRandomized controlled trial
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Problem: Thyroid dysfunction is common in older people, with females at higher risk. Evidence suggests that thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) naturally increases with age. Subclinical hypothyroidism (SCH) is diagnosed when serum thyroid-stimulating hormone levels are mildly elevated while free thyroxine levels are within normal range. With uniform TSH reference ranges across the adult lifespan, a diagnosis of SCH is more likely with increasing age. Patients with SCH are often prescribed levothyroxine. This review investigates the cardiovascular and bone health impacts of levothyroxine in patients over 50 years old with a baseline diagnosis of SCH. Approach: Systematic review and meta-analysis. An advanced search function was performed across the Cochrane, Embase, Medline, PubMed, and Web of Science databases to collate previous studies that evaluated cardiovascular and bone health outcomes in SCH patients with and without levothyroxine, from inception until the 3rd of August 2023. The remaining studies were assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for randomised controlled trials and the Newcastle-Ottawa quality of assessment for observational studies. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) tool was then used to assess the overall quality of each study. The results where then pooled by their odds ratios, using R-programming. Findings: Seven studies that recruited 5,887 participants, ranging from 45.4 to 80.1 years of age were selected. Six studies for cardiovascular outcomes were pooled for meta-analysis, there was no association between levothyroxine and cardiovascular outcomes in the SCH patients aged over 65 years [pooled OR 0.99; 95% confidence interval (0.74-1.11)]. The results also showed no association between levothyroxine use and bone health outcomes for SCH patients aged over 65 years [pooled OR 0.99; 95% confidence interval (0.52-1.88)]. No heterogeneity was found between the 6 cardiovascular and the 3 bone health outcome articles (I2 =0%). Consequences: We found no association between levothyroxine use and cardiovascular and bone health outcomes in SCH participants over 65 years, indicating that more studies are needed on levothyroxine and its implications on cardiovascular and bone health outcomes in the older population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.941
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0110.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it