MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7036287768

Cardiovascular and bone health outcomes in older people with subclinical hypothyroidism treated with levothyroxine: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2024· other· en· W7036287768 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueSunderland Repository (University of Sunderland) · 2024
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLevothyroxineSubclinical infectionObservational studyOdds ratioConfidence intervalMeta-analysisBone healthRandomized controlled trial
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Problem: Thyroid dysfunction is common in older people, with females at higher risk. Evidence suggests that thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) naturally increases with age. Subclinical hypothyroidism (SCH) is diagnosed when serum thyroid-stimulating hormone levels are mildly elevated while free thyroxine levels are within normal range. With uniform TSH reference ranges across the adult lifespan, a diagnosis of SCH is more likely with increasing age. Patients with SCH are often prescribed levothyroxine. This review investigates the cardiovascular and bone health impacts of levothyroxine in patients over 50 years old with a baseline diagnosis of SCH. Approach: Systematic review and meta-analysis. An advanced search function was performed across the Cochrane, Embase, Medline, PubMed, and Web of Science databases to collate previous studies that evaluated cardiovascular and bone health outcomes in SCH patients with and without levothyroxine, from inception until the 3rd of August 2023. The remaining studies were assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for randomised controlled trials and the Newcastle-Ottawa quality of assessment for observational studies. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) tool was then used to assess the overall quality of each study. The results where then pooled by their odds ratios, using R-programming. Findings: Seven studies that recruited 5,887 participants, ranging from 45.4 to 80.1 years of age were selected. Six studies for cardiovascular outcomes were pooled for meta-analysis, there was no association between levothyroxine and cardiovascular outcomes in the SCH patients aged over 65 years [pooled OR 0.99; 95% confidence interval (0.74-1.11)]. The results also showed no association between levothyroxine use and bone health outcomes for SCH patients aged over 65 years [pooled OR 0.99; 95% confidence interval (0.52-1.88)]. No heterogeneity was found between the 6 cardiovascular and the 3 bone health outcome articles (I2 =0%). Consequences: We found no association between levothyroxine use and cardiovascular and bone health outcomes in SCH participants over 65 years, indicating that more studies are needed on levothyroxine and its implications on cardiovascular and bone health outcomes in the older population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.026
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.054

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.026
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0180.035
Bibliometrics0.0070.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSunderland Repository (University of Sunderland)French-language works237,207