MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7036440921

Búsqueda de genes candidatos asociados a caracteres de interés \nagronómico en garbanzo (Cicer arietinum L.)

2015· dissertation· es· W7036440921 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversidad de Córdoba Insitutional Repository (Universidad de Córdoba) · 2015
Typedissertation
Languagees
FieldPsychology
TopicSleep and related disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEuropean Regional Development FundEuropean CommissionSaskatchewan Pulse GrowersMinistry of Agriculture - SaskatchewanInstituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria
KeywordsPopulationRhizobiumBiological evolution
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Las leguminosas son una fuente importante de proteínas y carbohidratos, además tienen \ncapacidad para establecer simbiosis con la bacteria Rhizobium fijando el nitrógeno \natmosférico en el suelo, por lo tanto es muy importante integrar estos cultivos en los \nsistemas de rotación para enriquecer el suelo con nitrógeno de manera natural (Aslam et \nal 2003). El garbanzo es la segunda leguminosa grano más importante del mundo \ndespués de las judías (Faostat, 2013). Sin embargo todavía no hay estudios relevantes a \nnivel molecular para entender los mecanismos de adaptación como el hábito de \ncrecimiento, simple/doble vaina y la fecha de floración siendo la mayoría de los estudios \npublicados de genética clásica (Mathews and Davis 1999; Rajesh et al. 2002; Aryamanesh \net al. 2013; Gaur et al. 2014). Estos caracteres son críticos para incrementar el \nrendimiento del cultivo (Rubio et al. 2004; Gaur et al. 2008). La secuenciación del genoma \nde garbanzo recién publicado (Jain et al. 2013; Varshney et al. 2013) ha sido de gran \nutilidad para buscar nuevos marcadores aplicables en MAS (marker assisted selection) y \ngenes candidatos. No obstante, disponer de poblaciones de mapeo como RIPs \n(recombinant inbred populations) y líneas casi isogénicas (NILs) que estén \ncuidadosamente fenotipadas, son fundamentales para llevar a cabo estos estudios.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversidad de Córdoba Insitutional Repository (Universidad de Córdoba)Same topicSleep and related disordersFrench-language works237,207