MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7036498768

CHEMICAL AND MINERALOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF AIRBORNE PARTICULATE MATTER ORIGINATING FROM MINING AND INDUSTRIAL OPERATIONS

2022· dissertation· en· W7036498768 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueQSpace (Queen's University Library) · 2022
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicEthnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParticulatesApportionmentOrganic matterCharacterization (materials science)Hazardous wasteKey (lock)Isotope analysis
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Activities performed at mining and other industrial operations are capable of producing significant quantities of particulate matter that, if not properly contained, can be harmful to workers, and can enter surrounding communities causing damage to local environments. Analysis of particulate matter through routine monitoring is not always sufficient for characterizing substances of concern and differentiating between sources that contribute to emissions. To better understand the types of particulate matter generated at Ni and Cu mining and processing operations in Canada and Europe, a combination of quantitative mineralogy and methods of geochemistry (bulk chemistry, sequential leaching, trace-element geochemistry, and Pb isotope systematics) were performed. Particulate matter samples with varying size ranges (PM10, PM2.5, respirable, and inhalable) were collected within the workplace and at ambient air monitoring stations adjacent to the operations. The composition of the overall dust and the types of metal compounds present in the dust were determined with the objective of assessing worker exposure and investigating the extent to which emissions reach the adjacent communities. Baseline analysis of particulate matter generated during key activities at the operations, and analysis of source materials and settled dust provided additional information that was used for calculating source apportionment and investigating strategies for mitigating emissions. 
\nThe key findings of the study are that, due to the complexity of sources, workplace exposure at any operation investigation beyond government-mandated guidelines to identify relationships between documented health effects in workers and specific exposures. Routine methods of characterizing hazardous metals in dust, such as sequential leaching, should be calibrated for individual operations that deal with a unique set of substances, and should include more than one type of analysis. When activities are performed at operations, only minimal wind speeds are necessary to transport dust distances at least 2 km from an operation into the surrounding environment and community, and a complex variety of particulate matter is present in urban areas surrounding industrial operations and can have multiple sources that are not related to the operation itself. The apportionment data allowed personnel at the operations to determine the source of emissions relative to activity, and mitigation strategies were implanted to reduce emissions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.573
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQSpace (Queen's University Library)Same topicEthnobotanical and Medicinal Plants StudiesFrench-language works237,207