MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7036550937

Characterization of depression subtypes and depression chronicity in middle aged and older adults: An Analysis of the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA)

2023· dissertation· en· W7036550937 on OpenAlexafffundabout

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPhytochemistry and Biological Activities
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMcGill University Health Centre
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchGovernment of Canada
KeywordsDepression (economics)Longitudinal studyLongitudinal dataDepressive symptomsCohort studyAgeing
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The heterogenous clinical presentations of depression are not sufficiently reflected by current diagnostic criteria.Associations between adverse childhood experiences (ACEs), allostatic load (AL), and depression subtypes have not been extensively studied.This study aimed to characterize depression subtypes based on their clinical presentations, and to elucidate the relationships between depression subtypes, AL biomarkers, and ACEs in a sample of middleaged and older adults.Participants from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging Comprehensive cohort with a score of 10 or more on the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression-10 item scale were included (n=3966).Latent profile analyses were used to determine depression subtypes and AL and ACE profiles.Multinomial logistic regression was used to determine associations between depression subtypes, stressor profiles and other covariates.Four distinct depression subtypes were identified, including positive affect (63.5%), melancholic (10.5%), typical (14.4%), and atypical (11.6%).Distinct associations between depression subtypes, ACE and AL profiles, and covariates of interest were observed.In particular, the atypical depression had the largest significant associations with stressors compared to the positive affect subtype; it was associated with an higher relative risk of lowcardiovascular AL profile (RRR 1.31, 95%CI: 1.02-1.68)and a lower risk of highcardiovascular AL profile (RRR 0.64, 95% CI: 0.49, 0.85) and a lower relative risk of physical abuse ACE (RRR 0.73, 95% CI: 0.57,0.93).The melancholic subtype had an increased risk of low cardiovascular AL (RRR 0.72, 95%CI: 0.53-0.99),and the typical subtype had a lower risk of high-cardiovascular AL (RRR 0.63, 95% CI: 0.43, 0.92).Other significant covariates differentiating the subtypes included age, sex, smoking status, chronic condition score, marital status, and physical activity.The present study describes distinct associations between depression subtypes and objective and self-reported measures of stress, as well as related factors that differentiate subtypes.The findings may inform more targeted and integrated clinical management strategies for depression in individuals exposed to multiple stressors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.110
Threshold uncertainty score0.222

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicPhytochemistry and Biological ActivitiesFrench-language works237,207