MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7036607004

Bone and horn harpoon heads of the Ontario Indians.

2014· article· en· W7036607004 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueQSpace (Queen's University Library) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicReligion, Theology, and Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFrench hornSound (geography)Context (archaeology)Period (music)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

I ntroductory.The fish-spear, or harpoon, was extensively used by many of the aboriginal inhabitants of North America.The first European colonists were astonished to see the abundance of fish in the rivers and lakes, and they found that the natives captured them in various ways with hook and line, nets, weirs and harpoons.In the accounts given by these early colonists and travellers, we find numerous references to the use of the latter implement.Captain John Smith said : "They of Accawmack use staves like unto javelins, headed with bone; with these they dart fish swimming in the water" (p. 36).In his "Account of Two Voyages to New England," John Josselyn gave a very similar description : "The Bass and Bleu-fish they take in har- bours and at the mouth of barr'd Rivers being in their Canows, strik- ing them with a fisgig, a kind of dart or staff, to the lower end whereof they fasten a sharp jagged bone (since they make them of Iron* with a string fastened to it, as soon as the fish is struck they pull away the staff, leaving the bony head in the fishes body, and fasten the other end of the string to the Canow.Thus they will hale after them to shore half a dozen or half a score great fishes" (p.140).According to Roger Williams, "The Natives venture one or two in a Canow, and with an harping Iron, or such like Instrument, sticke this fish, and so hale it into their Canow" (p.102).Loskiel, in speaking of the Delawarcs and Iroquois, said : "The Indians always carry hooks and small harpoons with them whenever they are on a hunting party" (Tart I., p. 94).The Montagnais, we are informed by Sag- ard (p.GS5), captured fish in two ways -"with a wicker basket or with a harpoon during night by the light of fire."The sturgeon harpoon of the Iroquois, as described by Charlevoix (p.ST) was secured to the canoe by a long cord.Le Jeune* describes the harpoon for spearing eels as "an instrument consisting of a long stick, of the thickness of three fingers, to the end of which they fasten an iron spike, which 'Relation de ce qvi.s'est passe en la Novvella France svr le grand Flevve de S. Lavrens en l'annee, 1634; Relation des Jesuites, etc. Vol.I. p. II [1] 1 C. they arm on each side with a curved prong, both coming nearly together at the end of the iron point.*'In striking an eel with this *An Eskimo specimen in our Museum is very much like the harpoon here described.It consists of a wooden shaft, about two feet long, pointed with an iron spike, on each side of which there are two thin flexible pieces of bone, armed with iron prongs.These prongs curve downwards, their points almost meeting and coming close to the point of the iron spike.Dr. Boas in his "Central Eskimo" (6th Ann.Rep. Bureau of Ethnology) figures two very similar specimens (fig. 453 a,a,b).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.449
Threshold uncertainty score0.905

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.160
Teacher spread0.152 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQSpace (Queen's University Library)Same topicReligion, Theology, and EducationFrench-language works237,207