MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7036718488

CM cycles on varieties fibered over Shimura curves, and «p»-adic «L»-functions

2010· other· en· W7036718488 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada) · 2010
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadiative Heat Transfer Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShimura varietyFibered knotAlgebraic numberQuadratic equationGeneralizationRamificationDegree (music)Modular formPrime (order theory)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Let f be a modular form of weight k ≥ 4 on a Shimura curve, let K be a quadratic imaginary field, and fix a rational prime p which is inert in K and di- vides the level of f. The goal of this thesis is to construct and study a collection of algebraic cycles on an appropriate Chow motive which encode data about the anticyclotomic p-adic L-function Lp(f,K,s) attached to f and K introduced by Bertolini-Darmon-Iovita-Spieß in [BDIS02]. In our setting, this function of a p-adic variable s vanishes in the critical range s = 1,...,k−1, and we study its derivative. After constructing this motive and the corresponding cycles, we compute their im- age under a p-adic analogue of the Griffiths-Weil Abel-Jacobi map, and show how this recovers the derivatives of the p-adic L-function at all the points in the critical range. Our main result can be viewed as a generalization of the result obtained by Iovita-Spieß in [IS03], which gives a similar formula for the “central” value s = k/2. It can also be seen as an extension of the construction of Bertolini-Darmon-Prasanna appearing in [BDP09] to the Shimura curve setting.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.136
Teacher spread0.133 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)Same topicRadiative Heat Transfer StudiesFrench-language works237,207