MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7036720442

Clinical Observation on Lumbar Muscle Fasciitis Treated by Siling and Tuina Exercise Technique Combined with Kinesiology Tape

2019· article· en· W7036720442 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSupine positionLumbarRehabilitationKinesiologyOrthopedic surgeryLow back painPlantar fasciitis
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective:To observe the clinical effect of Siling and Tuina exercise technique combined with kinesiology tape(KT)on lumbar muscle fasciitis and explore the changes of MPF in the frequency domain of surface electromyography, and explain the mechanism of this comprehensive rehabilitation program on the improvement of lumbar muscle fasciitis.Methods:A total of 60 lumbar muscle fasciitis patients treated in the outpatient department of the rehabilitation center of the second affiliated hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine were collected. The eligible patients were divided into treatment group and control group by random number table method, with 30 cases in each group. The treatment group was treated with Siling and Tuina exercise technique combined with KT, while the control group was only treated with KT.In the suspension state, the patients in the treatment group underwent local meridian stretch and rib rectification, combined with the open and closed chain active movement in the supine position and prone position for 30 minutes. Then the patients in the treatment group received KT, which followed the principle of"improving pain threshold, promoting circulation, and relieving fatigue". The patients were given sticking with shapes of"X"and"claw"KT under appropriate position for 24 hours, once a day. The same KT was performed in the control group. The above two groups were treated once a day, five times for a course of treatment, two days rest between courses, and a total of four courses of treatment. Before and after the treatment, McGill simplified scale was used to assess the changes in pain degree of patients, and the changes in frequency domain index(MPF)in sEMG were used to assess the changes in the fatigue degree of bilateral multifidus muscle and vertical spine muscle. Rehabilitation follow-up was conducted three months after the end of treatment, and the recurrence rate was calculated.Results:After four courses of treatment, the scores of McGill simplified scale of two groups were lower than those before treatment, and the decrease was more obvious in the treatment group than that in the control group(P<0.05);the MPF value of the dorsalis multifidus and erector spinalis were decreased in both groups, but the MPF value decreased more significantly in the treatment group than that in the control group(P<0.05);the recovery rate of the treatment group was higher than that of the control group(P<0.05);the recurrence rate in the treatment group was lower than that in the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion:The treatment of lumbar muscle fasciitis with Siling and Tuina exercise technique combined with KT is more effective than that of simple KT, and the long-term effect is better than that of simple KT.This comprehensive rehabilitation program has the advantages of simple operation and low recurrence rate, and is worthy of clinical promotion and application.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.122
GPT teacher head0.478
Teacher spread0.356 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Same topicWildlife-Road Interactions and ConservationFrench-language works237,207