MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7036803462

The Centre for Evidence Based Library and Information Practice (C-EBLIP) Director’s Report to the Dean on 2016/17

2017· report· en· W7036803462 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan) · 2017
Typereport
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth Sciences Research and Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWindsorPresentation (obstetrics)Work (physics)InstitutionBachelorWelshInternationalization
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

2016/17 saw a continuation of the work begun the previous year. The C-EBLIP Research Network (CRN) was formed. The CRN was an affiliation of international institutions interested in librarians as researchers and/or evidence based practice. Great strides were made in recruiting member institutions from around the world. As of April 2017, members included the following affiliates:  University of Windsor Library, Windsor, ON, Canada  Concordia Library, Montreal, PQ, Canada  University of Victoria Library, Victoria, BC, Canada  University of Alberta Libraries, Edmonton, AB, Canada  Carleton Library, Ottawa, ON, Canada  University of Northampton Library, Northampton, UK  LARK Library Applied Research Kollektive (ALIA group), Australia  University of Toronto Libraries, Toronto, ON, Canada  Mount Royal University Library, Calgary, ON, Canada  Cambridge University Library and Office of Scholarly Communication, Cambridge, UK  Western Libraries, London, ON, Canada  UBC Okanagan Library, Kelowna, BC, Canada  Flinders University Library, Adelaide, Australia  University of Regina Library, Regina, SK, Canada  University Library, University of Saskatchewan  Hong Kong Baptist University Library  University of Southern Queensland Library, Australia  Public Health England Knowledge & Library Services, Bristol, UK  Loyola Marymount University Library, Los Angeles, CA, USA  Health Research Board, Dublin, Ireland This work aligned with the internationalization efforts of the University of Saskatchewan, and further enhanced the University Library’s reputation as an institution strong in librarian researchers. I travelled to Toronto in February of 2017 to give a poster presentation at the Ontario Library Association’s Super Conference about the Research Network. Momentum was really picking up after a year of recruitment and promotion. Unfortunately, due to the poor provincial budget and concerns from new library leadership about return on investment and sustainability, the C-EBLIP Research Network was dismantled in April 2017. While C-EBLIP is still focused on supporting librarians as researchers and promoting evidence based library and information practice, the opportunity for expansion and further developments in this area outside of the University Library has been curtailed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.149
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.215
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.980
Threshold uncertainty score0.789

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1490.215
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.003
Bibliometrics0.0070.007
Science and technology studies0.0070.008
Scholarly communication0.0280.011
Open science0.0070.022
Research integrity0.0210.020
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1110.074

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan)→Same topicHealth Sciences Research and Education→French-language works237,207→