MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7036855881

Covid-19 Therapy and Treatment: A Scientometric Study of Indian Publications

2021· article· en· W7036855881 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLincoln (University of Nebraska) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBryophyte Studies and Records
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersScience and Engineering Research BoardIndian Council of Medical ResearchDepartment of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India
KeywordsScopusChinaNew delhiPosition (finance)BibliometricsMedical journal
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper examines 2539 Indian publications on Covid-19 Therapy and Treatment, as covered in Scopus database during 2019-May 2021. The top 10 most productive countries individually contributed global share of 33136, with USA accounting for the highest publication share with 8538, followed by China with 4558, Italy with 3707, United Kingdom with 3184, India with 2539, Spain with 1625, Germany with 1563, France with 1539, Canada with 1353 and Iran with 1212 Publications. India is ranked at 5th position in global Covid-19 Therapy and Treatment research output. USA topped the list with 309 share in India’s international collaborative papers, followed by U.K. 161, Saudi Arabia 108, Australia 83, Italy 79 and China70, etc. The most productive Institutions are: All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi with 173 Publications, followed by Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh with 141, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences Deemed to be University with 71, Manipal Academy of Higher Education with 59. It is noted that 118 Institutions with more than 10 Publications, 5 Institutions with more than 50 Publications. The most preferred journals are: Journal Of Biomolecular Structure And Dynamics scored with 67 Publications, followed by Diabetes And Metabolic Syndrome Clinical Research And Reviews with 56, International Journal Of Current Research And Review with 42. The most leading authors are: Dhama, K. from Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Bareilly, India with 38 Publications followed by Tiwari, R. from College of Veterinary Science India, Tirupati, India with 23, Malik, Y.S. from Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Bareilly, India with 16, Javaid M from Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi, India and Medhi, B. from Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, Chandigarh, India and Vaishya, R. Indraprastha Apollo Hospitals, New Delhi, India with 15 respectively. Major portion of these publications appeared in foreign journals of repute, as reflected by their impact factors and Citescores. The study also indicates that Indian scientists have huge international collaboration in this field. Indian literature output peaked at about the same time as that of the world output.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.585
Threshold uncertainty score0.592

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLincoln (University of Nebraska)Same topicBryophyte Studies and RecordsFrench-language works237,207