Conflict Resolution In The South Caucasus: The EU'S Role
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To the European Union and its Member States: To increase the EU's visibility and effectiveness as a political actor 1. Open fully-staffed European Commission Delegations in Baku and Yerevan.2. Strengthen the EUSR's regional presence by at a minimum appointing a EUSR political analyst in each of the three South Caucasus capitals.3. Start a public awareness campaign in the region about the EU, its values, institutions, programs and conflict resolution capabilities.To take full advantage of the negotiating process for European Neighbourhood Policy Action Plans 4. Define the peaceful resolution of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict as an Action Plan priority for Armenia and Azerbaijan, with the Plan aimed specifically at ensuring that: Conflict Resolution in the South Caucasus: The EU's Role Crisis Group Europe Report N°173, 20 March 2006 Page iii agreement on the principles of a settlement is agreed between Azerbaijan and Armenia.15.In the case of the Council, request the Secretariat to develop ESDP options in support of peace implementation, send assessment missions in close cooperation with the OSCE and begin contingency planning so as to prepare for:(a) deployment of peacekeepers around Nagorno-Karabakh; and(b) deployment of a civilian crisis management advisory team to engage in DDR, security sector reform, mediation, political affairs, human rights and media issues in and around Nagorno-Karabakh. To support the peaceful resolution of the Georgian-South Ossetian and Georgian-Abkhazian conflicts16. Expand the Commission's role in addressing the Georgian-South Ossetian conflict and finance another tranche of aid to support projects identified in the OSCE needs assessment.17. Once Georgia passes the appropriate law and designates a budget line for its implementation, make funding available to its new property commission and property restitution fund.18. Agree a Joint Action to provide financial support for the Joint Control Commission (JCC) mechanism in April 2006.19. Request the JCC and the parties to the Geneva process to invite the EUSR to observe their meetings and activities.20. Raise the Georgian-South Ossetian and Georgian-Abkhazia conflicts at EU-Russia summits and other high-level dialogue forums.21.Continue the border management assistance mission and facilitate communication and cooperation between Georgian and Russian border guards.22. Agree a Joint Action to support a Georgian-South Ossetian Special Coordination Centre and joint policing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".