MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7036982274

Court Proceedings of Craven County, North Carolina: Land Sales, Religious Petitions, and Debt Acknowledgments, June 21, 1730

2025· other· en· W7036982274 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicHymenoptera taxonomy and phylogeny
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFellDeedOathGeorge (robot)DebtQuarter (Canadian coin)Minor (academic)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This document is a handwritten copy of the original minutes from the Court of Pleas and Quarter Sessions in Craven County, North Carolina, dated June 21, 1730. The record opens with a deed of sale, in which a lot of land in Newbern (now New Bern, N.C.) is transferred to George Roberts. The transaction was duly acknowledged in court. Following this, the court records a petition from a group of dissenters requesting permission to construct a place of worship. The court's decision to grant this request is conditional upon the group's oath to behave peaceably and to uphold proper moral conduct. The rest of the document chronicles a series of individuals--such as John James, Samuel Harvey, John Brooks, and others--appearing before the court to acknowledge debts and offer sureties to ensure future court appearances and good behavior. The entries follow a consistent structure: names, declarations of indebtedness to the crown, pledged amounts (often £20), and details about the court's satisfaction with the arrangements. The reverse side of the document affirms that this copy was transcribed from a record book covering 1730-1746 and was presented to Wake Forest College through Professor W. L. Poteat. A faint note at the bottom remarks that June 21, 1730, fell on a Sunday; June 21, 1740, fell on a Saturday; and June 23, 1740 fell on a Monday.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.753
Threshold uncertainty score0.497

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0200.002
Scholarly communication0.0070.001
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0050.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0650.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHymenoptera taxonomy and phylogenyFrench-language works237,207