MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7037000352

Demographic Landscape and Practice Patterns of Canadian Orthodontists

2023· article· en· W7037000352 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueScholarship@Western (Western University) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCommunication and COVID-19 Impact
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGraduation (instrument)CensusCertificationSpecialtyPopulationDental practiceBoard certificationStatistical analysis
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: To obtain information on the current demographic landscape and practice patterns of orthodontists in Canada. Methods: Dental regulatory authorities were contacted and surveyed on number, sex, dental school, graduate orthodontic program, years of dentistry and specialty graduation, and location of practice of licensed orthodontists. Information on professional memberships, fellowship, and board certification status was collected from the affiliated resources. The number and distribution of orthodontists was compared on a regional and population level with the aid of Statistics Canada records. Practice patterns were identified for licensed orthodontists in regards to sex, educational training, work experience, practice location, fellowship status, board certification, and professional memberships. Census divisions were extrapolated from practice locations to illustrate the spatial distribution of orthodontists, and statistical analysis identified associations between practice patterns and demographic and social factors. Results: Number: 932 orthodontists were identified (2.4 per 100,000 population) with 48 practitioners registered in more than one jurisdiction. Sex: 35% of orthodontists in Canada are currently female with the proportion of female graduates increasing over time. Training: 73% of orthodontists graduated from a Canadian dental school, while 63% graduated from a Canadian orthodontic specialty program. Certification: 57% of orthodontists were fellows of the RCDC and 9% were board certified with the ABO. Professional Membership: 53% of orthodontists were members of the CAO and 44% were members of the AAO. Experience: The mean years of experience was 18.5 with a median year of graduation of 2005. Location: Most orthodontists in Canada practiced out of one location (72%). Although considerable regional variation was noted with the distribution of orthodontists in Canada, a greater number of orthodontists practiced in regions with higher population densities and household incomes. Rural regions remained relatively underserved. Conclusions: This study is the first of its kind to characterize the demographics of orthodontists in Canada. This information will enable professional associations, graduate training programs, dental regulatory authorities, and government policymakers to better understand the orthodontic workforce to the benefit of the profession and the public.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.793
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.175
GPT teacher head0.389
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it