MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7037056556

Decay-Induced Changes in the Physical and Mechanical Properties of First Year Ice.

2001· article· en· W7037056556 on OpenAlexfundvenueaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueNPARC · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPolar Research and Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersTransport Canada
KeywordsBoreholeSea iceIce formationArctic ice packSalinitySea ice thickness
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper describes the results and analysis of one season of measurements of decayed first year sea ice in the central Canadian Arctic. The study was conducted from 21 May to 19 July 2000 during which time the mean air temperature steadily increased from –15°C to a maximum of +7.5°C. The ice was 1.20 m thick when the program began on 21 May and had decreased to 0.83 m thick by 19 July. On average, the ice ablated at a rate of about 23 mm/day during the program. Initially, the average salinity throughout the full thickness of ice was 5.5 ‰. By 19 July measurements showed that the bulk salinity of the ice had decreased to less than 0.5 ‰. The upper and lower surfaces of the ice began to desalinate before the bulk layer of ice. One of the main components of the study was to measure the in situ confined compressive strength of the ice with a borehole jack assembly; 110 borehole jack tests were conducted from 21 May to 19 July. Over the nine-week period, the in situ strength of the ice decreased from 12 to 3 MPa. Measurements showed that the ice maintained a strength of 3 MPa during the last three weeks of the study. The ice continued to ablate during that time. Most of the decrease in ice strength resulted from changes in the physical properties of the ice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.495
Threshold uncertainty score0.440

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2001
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNPARCSame topicPolar Research and EcologyFrench-language works237,207