MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7037286781

Effect of atmospheric humidity and temperature on the flowability of lubricated powder metallurgy mixes

2009· article· en· W7037286781 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueNPARC · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicChaos control and synchronization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPowder metallurgyZinc stearateHumidityCompactionRelative humidityMetal powderParticle sizeFlow (mathematics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Good powder mix flowability is required in high-volume powder metallurgy (P/M) manufacturing in order to ensure a uniform and consistent filling of the die cavities and, in turn, high productivity, low rejection rates, part integrity and consistent part-to-part characteristics such as dimensional change. Apart from the particle size and the shape of the metallic powders and additives, lubricants, even though admixed in small quantities (<1.5 weight %), have a significant impact on the flow characteristics of powder lend formulations. In addition to that, the blending parameters and the atmospheric conditions such as powder temperature and atmosphere temperature and humidity, may also affect significantly the flow of powder mixes. For instance, it is know that some mixes produced during humid and hot summer days may behave differently. In this paper, the effect of relative humidity and temperature on the flow of conventional P/M mixes containing different types of lubricants was studied. Typically, amide wax, Kenolube, zinc stearate as well as proprietary lubricants were admixed in a V-blender enclused in an environmental chamber set at different humidity and temperature levels to simulate different atmospheric and processing conditions. The sensitivity to such conditions of the different lubricants was assessed and the influence on the flow of the powder mixes as well as on the compaction and ejection behaviors was measured.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.316
Threshold uncertainty score0.424

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNPARCSame topicChaos control and synchronizationFrench-language works237,207