MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7037437447

Electrokinetic remediation of a nitrate-contaminated soil

2004· dissertation· en· W7037437447 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2004
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrokinetic Soil Remediation Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsElectrokinetic phenomenaElectrokinetic remediationNitrateEnvironmental remediationGroundwaterSoil waterAnodeCathode
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The potential for groundwater contamination by inorganic forms of nitrogen from intensive livestock operations has become a major concern for surrounding communities that use groundwater as their water supply.The traditional pump-and-treat method is ineffective in medium to fine textured agricultural soils due to their low hydraulic conductivity.Application of an electrical potential gradient results in the movement of charged particles and water in soil.A diffise double layer formed around hydrated clay particles is the basis for the electrokinetic phenomena.Three sets of laboratory experiments were conducted to assess the effectiveness of electrokinetic methods in remediating a nitrate contaminated soil i.e. the first set of experiments tested denitrification of nitrates, the second looked at retarding nitrate ion movement, and the third evaluated the complete remediation of a nitrate contaminated soil using electrokinetics.The first set of laboratory experiments showed that the nitrates in soil can be converted to other forms using electrokinetic treatment.The conversion occurred at the cathode (negative electrode) and in the surrounding soil.After nine days of electrokinetic treatment, compared to control, the nitrate concentration at the inflow end and at a relative distance of 0.2 in electrokinetic columns were significantly (p<0.05)lower showing successful reduction of nitrates near the cathode end.The second set of laboratory experiments showed that nitrate ion movement can be retarded by applying an electrical potential gradient.The retardation occurred at the anode (positive electrode).The application of the electrical potential gradient induced a nitrate ion barrier around the anode against a hydraulic gradient o11.25.Nitrate concentration at a relative distance of 0 2 from the anode was significantly lower (p<0.05)than that in the hydraulic column even after thirteen days of treatment.The third set of experiments showed that by changing the polarity of the electrodes after a period of time, the nitrate levels in a contaminated soil can be brought to below 10 mg NO3-N L-t which is the Maximum Acceptable Concentration (MAC) for nitrate in drinking water in Canada.Six days after switching polarity, the nitrate concentration at a relative distance of Q.2 from the cathode was significantly lower (p<0.05)than that in the hydraulic column.The nitrate concentrations in the entire treatment columns were brought to <5 mg NO3-N L-l and significantly lower (p<0.05)than control by the twelfth day.Electrokinetic treatment retarded nitrate movement against a hydraulic gradient of 1.25, and effectively restored a medium textured soil contaminated with NO,-N.To achieve optimum results in the field, the electrodes have to be located based on contamination location and the direction of the hydraulic gradient.ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I would like to express my deep appreciation to Dr. R.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.135
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.176
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMspace (University of Manitoba)Same topicElectrokinetic Soil Remediation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207