MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7037462242

Evaluating a mentorship program focused on meeting the needs of immigrant children and refugee youth in Winnipeg

2021· dissertation· en· W7037462242 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2021
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdvanced NMR Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMentorshipAgency (philosophy)RefugeePositive Youth DevelopmentImmigrationQualitative researchProgram evaluationPsychological resilienceBest practice
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study was undertaken in part to fulfill requirements of the master’s degree program in Sociology at the University of Manitoba. The broader applied purpose of the study is to generate baseline data that will be used to evaluate a youth mentorship program at the NEEDS centre agency in Winnipeg, Canada. This evaluation-based study also seeks to provide the management team with a program description, a literature review revolving around notions of resilience and risk, positive youth development, youth development programming, youth mentoring and delinquency prevention as well as mentoring immigrant children and refugee youth. The youth mentorship program is designed to help immigrant children and refugee youth ages 6-18 years to help them settle in Canadian society. The aim of the program is to enable children and youth to build relationships with mentors who take them out in the community to engage in recreational and educational activities. This study seeks to capture a clear picture of the services and support that newcomer children, youth and their families receive in Winnipeg. The study will generate knowledge that will help to guide the development of appropriate services to best meet the needs of program participants. The study will also address this knowledge gap through a qualitative examination of the experiences of individuals and their families seeking help. This was achieved through Zoom based one-on-one interviews firstly with program staff, secondly with mentors and thirdly with parents of program participants. These interviews will form the backbone of the needed firsthand experiences of key stakeholders required in order for the NEEDS centre to more fully assess and potentially make needed changes to its youth mentorship program. Interviews with program staff and mentors focus on programming and organizational activities. Interviews with parents of participants focus on the needs of their children and families.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.754
Threshold uncertainty score0.489

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMspace (University of Manitoba)Same topicAdvanced NMR Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207