Effect of hydrokinesitherapy on the rehabilitation outcome in patients after total hip replacement
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background/Aim: Total hip replacement is considered as one of the most successful treatment methods in orthopaedic surgery of the 20th century, since it significantly improves the quality of life of the individuals with coxarthrosis. Protocols and the organisation of the postoperative rehabilitation differ significantly around the world. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of hydrokinesitherapy on the rehabilitation outcome in patients after total hip replacement under in-patient conditions. Methods: This prospective clinical trial included a total of 100 patients of both genders , average age 59.11 ± 8.85 years, which were admitted to the in-patient post-operative rehabilitation after total hip replacement. Patients were randomised in two groups: group A (n = 50) that was subjected to rehabilitation program with hy-drokinesiherapy and group B (n = 50) that was subjected to rehabilitation program only. The parameters registered were: the range of movement in the operated hip, the circumference of the femoral musculature and the Western Ontario and McMas-ter Universities Osteoarthritis Indeks (WOMAC index) at admittance and discharge from in-patient rehabilitation. Results: The average values of hip flexion with extended knee, extension and external hip rotation were significantly better in group A (p < 0.05). The values of the circumference of the femoral musculature and WOMAC index in patients from group A were significantly better on discharge compared to the admission. Also, this group had a statistically significantly better values of the circumference of the femoral musculature and value of WOMAC index at discharge compared to patients from group B (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Hydrokinesitherapy as a part of the protocol for postoperative rehabilitation in patients after total hip replacement leads to a faster improvement of the functional status of the operated hip and patient's quality of life.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".