MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7037571550

Effects of Annual and Perennial Forage Systems on Forage Biomass and Quality, Grazing Animal Performance and Enteric Emissions, and System Economics

2024· dissertation· en· W7037571550 on OpenAlexafffund

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan) · 2024
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicDiatoms and Algae Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersAlberta Beef ProducersMinistry of Agriculture - Saskatchewan
KeywordsForageGrazingPerennial plantBromus inermisSecaleTrifolium alexandrinumHordeum vulgareFodder
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Two experiments were conducted to evaluate annual and perennial forage systems with respect to forage yield and quality, grazing animal performance, rumen fermentation, enteric methane production, and system economics. Forage systems included (1) CDC Austenson barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) + 4010 pea (Pisum sativum L.) + Winfred forage brassica (Brassica oleracea L.× Brassica rapa L.) + Gorilla forage brassica (Brassica napus L.) (BRPEBRS), (2) AC Hazlet fall rye (Secale cereale L.) + Frosty berseem clover (Trifolium alexandrinum L.) (FRCLOV), (3) AC Success hybrid bromegrass (Bromus riparius Rehm. × Bromus inermis Leyss.) + PS3006 alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) (HBGALF), and (4) AC Armada meadow bromegrass (Bromus riparius Rehm.) + AAC Mountainview sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.) (MBGSF). Experiment 1 was conducted over a 2-yr period (2020 and 2021). Each yr, Bos taurus crossbred steers (n = 156, initial body weight = 364 ± 17 kg) were randomly allocated to 1 of 4 forage systems (n = 3 replicates/treatment) for 54 ± 21 d grazing period each year. Dry matter yield (DMY) of HBGALF was greater (P < 0.01; 3046 kg ha-1) than all other treatments. Annual forage systems had greater (P < 0.01) total digestible nutrients (64.8 vs. 58.6% TDN), greater (P < 0.01) crude protein (13.7 vs. 10.2% CP), less (P < 0.01) neutral detergent fibre (46.9 vs. 59.5% NDF) and greater (P < 0.01) digestibility (74.9 vs. 61.85% NDFD30hr) than perennial forage systems. Steers grazing FRCLOV had greater (P < 0.01) DMI than all other treatments. Total beef production was greatest (P = 0.03) for HBGALF (124 kg ha-1). Enteric methane results were not conclusive. Economic net returns were also greatest (P < 0.01) for HBGALF. In Experiment 2, the in vitro ruminal fermentation of the forage treatments were investigated using the rumen simulation technique (RUSITEC). Annual forage systems had the greatest (P < 0.01) nutrient disappearance, greatest (P < 0.01) total volatile fatty acid (VFA) production (99 vs. 92 mmol d-1), and greatest (P< 0.01) ammonia-nitrogen (NH3-N) production (48.5 vs. 33.8 mg d-1). These fermentation parameters support improved growth performance in ruminants grazing annual forage systems however, DMY of perennial forage systems had a larger impact on total beef production and profitability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan)Same topicDiatoms and Algae ResearchFrench-language works237,207