MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7037625598

Exploring the Association Between Cirrhosis and Outcomes Among Patients with Lung Cancer in Ontario Between 2007 and 2017: A Population-Based Study

2025· dissertation· en· W7037625598 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueQSpace (Queen's University Library) · 2025
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicLepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCirrhosisLung cancerLogistic regressionProportional hazards modelStage (stratigraphy)Prospective cohort studyCancerPalliative care
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Cirrhosis is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, but its impact on outcomes in the treatment of lung cancer is not well described. Population-based data provide estimates where prospective data is lacking and may aid in the quantification of risk for patients undergoing radical and palliative treatment. Methods: All patients diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Ontario, Canada, from 2007 to 2017 were identified using the provincial database ICES, and those with cirrhosis were identified using validated coding. The association between cirrhosis and morbidity and mortality, both postoperatively and post-palliative systemic anti-cancer therapy, was evaluated using logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier curves, and competing risks analysis. Results: Among patients with stages I-III NSCLC who underwent lung resection (n=59,226 overall, n=1,780 (3%) with cirrhosis), patients with cirrhosis had a higher overall mortality rate at both 30 days (5% vs. 2%, p<0.001) and 90 days (8% vs. 3%, p<0.001). More patients with cirrhosis were admitted to the ICU, readmitted to the hospital within both 30 and 90 days, and stayed in the hospital longer. After multivariable logistic regression, cirrhosis was associated with death at 30 days (OR 2.35, 95% CI 1.39-3.99, p<0.001) and 90 days (OR 2.10, 95% CI 1.38-3.21, p<0.001); development of postoperative complications within 90 days (HR 1.44, 95% CI 1.14-1.81, p=0.002); and hospital readmission at both 30 (OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.41-2.56, p<0.001) and 90 days (OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.27-2.10, p=0.001). Using adjusted Cox regression among those with stage IV NSCLC, cirrhosis was associated with worse overall survival (HR 1.10, 95% CI 1.02-1.18, p=0.016). However, using competing risks analysis with liver-related morality as a competing event, there was no association between cirrhosis and cancer-specific mortality (sHR 1.04, 95% CI 0.95-1.13, p=0.395). Conclusions: Cirrhosis is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in patients with stages I-III NSCLC undergoing surgery. In stage IV NSCLC, patients with cirrhosis are less likely to receive systemic palliative treatment than their counterparts, and may experience more post-treatment complications, but are not at a significantly increased risk of death when the competing risk of liver death is accounted for.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.110

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQSpace (Queen's University Library)→Same topicLepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy→French-language works237,207→