MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7037640338

Exploring the Contributions of Nursing to Well-Child Care within Interprofessional Primary Care Teams

2023· dissertation· en· W7037640338 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueQSpace (Queen's University Library) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicInterprofessional Education and Collaboration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScope (computer science)Scope of practiceContext (archaeology)Health carePrimary carePrimary nursingPrimary health careDescriptive research
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Registered nurses (RN) are well positioned to deliver well-child care, and health system reform calls for the effective use of interprofessional health care providers to meet the evolving needs within the primary care sector. Despite this, little is known about how RNs contribute to the delivery of well-child care or the attributes of the nursing care organization that influence RN scope of practice enactment in the delivery of well-child care. Purpose The overarching aim of this study was to explore attributes within the nursing care organization framework related to RN contributions to well-child care within the context of interprofessional primary care teams. Methodology To address the research aim, a multiple methods study was conducted which included a scoping review and a multiple-case study. We conducted the scoping review using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) scoping review methodology. We used Yin’s approach to case study methodology for the multiple-case study. Cases included three interprofessional primary care teams in Ontario. Data collected included surveys, interviews, and administrative electronic health data. Descriptive pattern matching was the analytic approach implemented. Findings Dimensions of well-child care were well aligned to the scope of practice of RNs; however, scope of practice enactment varied between and within organizations. Support for the RN role, interprofessional collaboration, trust, role clarity, strategic leadership, funding structures, and team composition influenced how RNs contributed to the delivery of well-child care. Conclusions The findings from this study identify how attributes of the nursing care organization influence scope of practice enactment and delivery of well-child care. In particular, findings will support the optimization of the nursing role in primary care and enhance access to well-child care among those who currently do not have access.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.017
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.028
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.112

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0170.028
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0060.005
Scholarly communication0.0080.003
Open science0.0020.008
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQSpace (Queen's University Library)→Same topicInterprofessional Education and Collaboration→French-language works237,207→