MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7037899067

Examining the experiences of post-ABI and neurological condition sequalae and workplace disclosure.

2023· article· en· W7037899067 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueRepository@Hull (Worktribe) (University of Hull) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicE-Learning and Knowledge Management
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnxietyPsychological interventionAcquired brain injuryEmpirical researchExploratory factor analysisNarrativeVariance (accounting)Locus of controlIntervention (counseling)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis portfolio is comprised of three parts, a systematic literature review, an empirical thesis, and appendices. Part 1 contains a systematic literature review, aiming to explore the experiences of individuals disclosing Multiple Sclerosis (MS) in the workplace. All qualitative data in this area was reviewed and the results of 10 studies were incorporated through a narrative synthesis. Four main themes were generated; Disclosure of MS, Transition in Identity, Group Reactions to the Individual following Disclosure and Locus of Change and Emotional Impact. These results have implications for ongoing support for individuals following an MS diagnosis. Part 2 contains the empirical study, which aims to understand the properties of the Brain Injury Fatigue Scale (BIFS). This study was comprised of two main aims which contribute to a larger ongoing study, firstly to identify the underlying factor structure within the BIFS and secondly to explore the moderating effects of brain injury on the relationship between fatigue and anxiety, depression, age and gender. The exploratory factor analysis uncovered a two-factor structure, with the main factor of ‘general fatigue’ explaining the majority of variance within the scale. A secondary factor of ‘cognitive and emotional impacts of fatigue’ was also identified. Additionally, positive correlations were found between fatigue and age, anxiety and depression. Within this, brain injury was shown to moderate the relationship between anxiety and fatigue. These results inform the ongoing debate around the dimensional nature of fatigue and have implications for fatigue interventions for individuals having sustained a brain injury. Part 3 contains the appendices. The attached appendices provide supporting documentation for the systematic literature review and the empirical study. Additionally, the appendices contain an epistemological statement and reflective statement written by the chief investigator.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.020
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.056
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.108

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0200.056
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.005
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRepository@Hull (Worktribe) (University of Hull)Same topicE-Learning and Knowledge ManagementFrench-language works237,207