MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7038160639

Generating knowledge while counseling families : case study research on therapeutic conversations in the Family Systems Care Unit in Switzerland

2024· article· en· W7038160639 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZürcher Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften digital collection (Zurich University of Applied Sciences) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBlockchain Technology in Education and Learning
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychological interventionCoping (psychology)Qualitative researchIntervention (counseling)Unit (ring theory)AnxietyTherapeutic relationshipSocial support
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: The Family Systems Care Unit is a university-run real-life lab offering family-systems-centered therapeutic conversations to burdened families based on the Calgary Family Assessment and Intervention Model and the Illness Beliefs Model. In previous studies, therapeutic conversations have alleviated stress and anxiety and facilitated problem-solving and family decision-making. Aim & Objectives: The overall aim of this research program is to understand how and why therapeutic conversations are supportive of families. Our objectives are to investigate how therapeutic conversations support families' functioning, health, and well-being and to explore how this support can be explained. Methods: Experienced, interprofessional family-systems care experts provide therapeutic conversations that are free of charge. We ask for consent to video-record and observe the therapeutic conversations through a one-way window for research. The conversations are transcribed verbatim and analyzed by applying qualitative case-study designs suitable for understanding the families and interventions within their complexity. Findings: We will present the first results of exemplary single-case studies revealing burdened families' complex demands and various needs. We will also demonstrate how therapeutic conversations support and strengthen these families in their everyday coping and symptom management. Discussion / Conclusion: Case-study is a convenient research design to gain in-depth insights into the process and effectiveness of therapeutic conversations while revealing the complexity of various interacting demands and strengths of families. Implication for Practice: The real-life lab setting simultaneously enables the collection of rich data for research and valuable support for families. This relation makes the real-life lab a setting for ethically sensitive and justifiable research

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.021
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.061

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.021
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0200.007
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0030.005
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZürcher Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften digital collection (Zurich University of Applied Sciences)Same topicBlockchain Technology in Education and LearningFrench-language works237,207