MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7038387205

The history of libraries in Halifax & Huddersfield from the mid-sixteenth century to the coming of the public libraries

2003· dissertation· en· W7038387205 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUCL Discovery (University College London) · 2003
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicHemiptera Insect Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReading (process)PublishingHistory of the bookLibrary historyPeriod (music)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis explores the development of libraries and associated subjects such as the
\nbook trade in Halifax and Huddersfield and their environs as defined by Halifax
\nparish and Almondbury, Huddersfield, Kirkburton and Kirkheaton parishes.
\nChronologically it covers a period of over three centuries from the mid-sixteenth
\ncentury to the coming of the public libraries in Halifax in 1882 and in Huddersfield
\nin 1898. The Introduction outlines reasons for undertaking this study and includes a
\nliterature review. It is followed by six chapters. Chapter 1 describes the economic,
\nreligious and educational background to the area to 1830. Chapter 2 on writing, the
\nbook trade and libraries from the mid-sixteenth century to the mid-eighteenth
\ncentury covers the development of bookselling and printing, Church of England and
\nnonconformist libraries and school libraries. Chapter 3 on the book trade and
\nlibraries from the mid-eighteenth century to 1830 comprises sections on bookselling
\nand printing, reading and private collections, school libraries, book clubs,
\nsubscription libraries, newsrooms, commercial circulating libraries and libraries of
\nchurches, chapels and religious organisations. Chapter 4 continues with the
\neconomic, religious and educational background for the second part of this study
\n1830-c. 90. Chapter 5 on secular libraries from 1830 to the coming of the public
\nlibraries includes bookselling and printing, reading and private collections, school
\nlibraries, subscription libraries, literary and philosophical society libraries and other
\nspecial libraries, mechanics' institute libraries, factory libraries, commercial
\ncirculating libraries, newsrooms and co-operative society libraries. Chapter 6 on libraries attached to churches, chapels and religious organisations for the same
\nperiod comprises sections on libraries of the Church of England, nonconformist
\nchapels, the Society of Friends and Sunday schools. An Epilogue describes the
\nintroduction of public libraries in Halifax and Huddersfield, but their subsequent
\nhistory is excluded. The thesis ends with a Conclusion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.139
Threshold uncertainty score0.912

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.179
Teacher spread0.161 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUCL Discovery (University College London)Same topicHemiptera Insect StudiesFrench-language works237,207