Implementasi Promosi Kesehatan Berdasarkan Ottawa Charter Dalam Pencapaian Sekolah Sehat (Studi di SMPN 26 Surabaya Sebagai Juara Sekolah Sehat Nasional Kategori Kinerja Terbaik 2019)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Health promotion in schools is an effort to strengthen the capacity of schools as a healthy setting for living, learning, and working continuously (WHO,1998). In order to achieve the success of the health school program (UKS) in health promotion efforts, the involvement of all parties including the government, school institutions, and the community including school committees is required, according to the Ottawa Charter. SMPN 26 Surabaya is a winner of healhty school environment contest in National level for the best performance category. This study aims to describe the implementation of health promotion in schools based on the Ottawa Charter at SMPN 26 Surabaya. This research is a descriptive qualitative research with case study research design. Informant was determined by purposive sampling. The data were collected through indepth interview and documentation. The result shows that for the element of healthy public policy has been done with the availability of written regulations on healthy behavior, but there are no clear written penalty for violating regulations. The element of creating a supportive environment has been implemented well, because there are already infrastructures that support healthy behavior. Elements of strengthening community action at SMPN 26 Surabaya are manifested through extracurricular activities, health movements, and school committees. The element of developing personal skills at SMPN 26 Surabaya are realized through learning during lesson hours and outside of lesson hours, according to the existing curriculum in the school. Elements of the reorganization of health services at SMPN 26 Surabaya have prioritized promotive and preventive efforts and did not neglect curative and rehabilitative efforts. In conclusion, majority elements of Ottawa Charter have been implemented well. But in the element of healthy public policy it is necessary to add the penalty variable for violating regulations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".