MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7038474735

THE IMPACT OF COST-SHARING CHANGES ON PRESCRIPTION ANTIBIOTIC FILL RATES IN CHILDREN WITH OTITIS MEDIA

2023· dissertation· en· W7038474735 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedical prescriptionOtitisPopulationPrescription drugAntibioticsPharmacyMultivariate analysis
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

From 1975, when the SPDP was initiated, until June 30, 1987, those with STD benefits paid a flat copayment per prescription, with the balance paid by the Province, directly to the pharmacy. On July 1, 1987 the cost-sharing scheme was changed to a deductible plus coinsurance in a nonassignment format. The assignment format returned on January 1, 1989. Children receiving SAP benefits retained first dollar coverage. The objective of the present study was to determine the impact of these changes on prescription antibiotic fill rates for children aged 0 to 14 years, with an otitis media diagnosis in the physician claims data base. Children receiving SAP benefits served as the nonequivalent control group. The hypotheses were: • the changes to STD benefits would have no impact on prescription antibiotic utilization rates in either group, and • stratification of the time series on selected variables would not reveal a statistically significant impact when comparing pre- and post-intervention periods in either population. The study was population-based and quasi-experimental, multiple time series by design. Data were gathered by record linkage of three Saskatchewan Health data bases: MCIB, PDSB, and the HIRF. Analysis included descriptive and interrupted time series analyses. Each population demonstrated a statistically significant decrease (p <0.05) in prescription antibiotic fill rates following the SPDP changes in STD benefits. However, the decrease experienced by the STD population was larger than seen in the SAP population by 2.569 prescriptions per 100 OM episodes. The second set of null hypotheses was rejected in all cases except both levels of Parent type in the SAP group, Specialist level of MD type in the SAP group, and the South level of Location in both SAP and STD groups. Interpopulation differences were found on all categories except Location-South. The STD population consistently demonstrated a decrease, while the SAP population demonstrated no changes or increases in fill rates. Overall the increased cost sharing for the SPDP STD beneficiaries negatively affected the fill rates of a necessary prescribed medication. Those considering increasing the patient cost share of a prescription drug program are cautioned that this may negatively affect the acquisition of necessary medications. This may worsen health outcome, and short-term savings may be offset by long-term expenses. Public program changes should include an evaluation component to facilitate such assessment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.020
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.069

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.020
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.175
Teacher spread0.162 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan)Same topicPlant Taxonomy and PhylogeneticsFrench-language works237,207