MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7038717802

The Irish study of sexual health and relationships sub-report 1 learning about sex and first sexual experiences

2011· report· en· W7038717802 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLenus, The Irish Health Repository (Dr Steevens Hospital Library) · 2011
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSubterranean biodiversity and taxonomy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIrishTabooHuman sexualityReproductive healthContext (archaeology)AttendanceHomosexualityQuarter (Canadian coin)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sex and sexuality (see glossary for definitions) has been a relatively taboo subject until
\nrecent decades in Ireland, as elsewhere. Perspectives on sex and sexuality in Ireland were
\ntraditionally shaped to a large extent by the teachings of the Catholic Church. Sexual intercourse
\nwas seen as appropriate only in the context of marriage, with the primary purpose of procreation.2
\nThroughout the 1960s and 1970s, a number of factors, including the wider availability of
\npopular media, brought about greater liberalism and increased discussion about sex in Ireland. As
\nwell, greater mobility, mainly of Irish people travelling abroad from the early 1980s, introduced a
\nwhole generation to new perspectives on sexual norms. Church attendance fell over this time and
\nthere was an increasing public challenge to the Catholic Church’s stance on issues such as access
\nto contraception. These factors contributed to the development of significant legislative changes
\nin the area of sexual health in the late 20th century. They resulted in increased availability of
\ncontraception, legalisation of divorce, decriminalisation of homosexuality and right to information
\non abortion.3 At the same time, education generally and sex education in particular have
\nincreasingly become the responsibility of the State. Irish society has seen a process of increasingly
\nliberal social norms.3 Evidence of this shift includes the separation of sex from a purely procreative
\nfunction and the view that sex is no longer exclusively associated with marriage.
\nThe investigation of sexual health and behaviour requires consideration of the range of
\nfactors that can influence them. As well as individual factors, external or structural factors (social,
\neconomic and environmental) can determine aspects of health and behaviour. The Department of
\nHealth and Children’s (2000) National Health Strategy states in its objectives that “the
\nachievement of health and well-being is not the responsibility of the individual alone”.4 A further
\nobjective aims to provide support to disadvantaged groups so that everyone has the same
\nopportunity to attain good health. These objectives highlight the role that external influences can
\nplay in determining health, and make clear that it is unlikely that individuals will be able to directly
\ncontrol external determinants of health.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.180
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLenus, The Irish Health Repository (Dr Steevens Hospital Library)Same topicSubterranean biodiversity and taxonomyFrench-language works237,207