MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7038969628

Ironie als Mittel politischen Engagements: der unzuverlässige Erzähler im Werk Heinrich von Kleists und Heinrich Bölls

2009· other· en· W7038969628 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada) · 2009
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAnimal Ecology and Behavior Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNovellaFocalizationNarrativeIronyBourgeoisieGermanNarratologyReading (process)ScholarshipMetanarrative
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This project examines the role of unreliable narration in the works of Heinrich von Kleist (1777-1811) and Heinrich Böll (1917-1985) as a form of political engagement. Its first section provides an extensive historical analysis of the scholarship on unreliable narration within the field of narratology. It argues for a shift away from structuralist narratological models and toward a hybrid model of historical, cultural and cognitive narratology. Furthermore, the case is made for a reconceptualization of unreliable narration as a fundamental form of "discrepant awareness" and as the equivalent of dramatic irony in prose. Building on this insight, it locates unreliable narrration in the trajectory of avant-gardist and partisan writing. Drawing on concepts of "subversive affirmation", such as Umberto Eco's "communications guerilla warfare", Michel Foucault's "non-positive affirmation", Slavoj Zizek's "over-identification", and Linda Hutcheon's theory of post-modern irony, it argues that unreliable narration is frequently used as a pedagogical tool by way of parodic subversion. The subsequent study of the works of Kleist and Böll further substantiates this claim. In trying to conform to the conventions of his time, the narrator in Kleist's journalistic writing and prose repeatedly cites a variety of contemporary genres, such as the "moralische Erzählung" and the bourgeois tragedy, as well as the aesthetic ideals of German Romanticism. His unreliability, however, allows Kleist not only to circumvent Napoleonic censorship, but also to infiltrate the public discourse and sabotage its codes. A close reading of the novella Michael Kohlhaas reveals how Kleist's narrator makes use of manipulated focalization to steer the reader's sympathies. By way of contrast, Heinrich Böll, in his novels Group Portrait with Lady and The Lost Honor of Katharina Blum, uses a narrator who sees himself as writing in the tradition

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.016
Scholarly communication0.0070.006
Open science0.0000.005
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.172
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)→Same topicAnimal Ecology and Behavior Studies→French-language works237,207→