MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7038987742

Latin Americanist Luis Almagro of Uruguay Chosen as New OAS Chief

2015· article· en· W7038987742 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUNM’s Digital Repository (University of New Mexico) · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicEvolution and Paleontology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSummitLatin AmericansForeign policyPanamaForeign relationsPresidential systemInternational relations
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Organization of American States (OAS) has picked a pivotal moment in Latin American and Caribbean affairs to "clean up" its image.On March 18, the international organization, whose task, since its founding in 1948, has been to "manage" regional crises, took advantage of the end of Chilean Jos Miguel Insulza's term as secretary general to designate a progressive, former Uruguayan foreign minister Luis Almagro, as his replacement.The post is an especially important one given that the OAS groups together all 34 countries in the Americas, from the southern tip of South America to Canada in the extreme north.Almagro will assume his OAS leadership functions on May 26.The move comes at a time when Venezuela considers itself under threat from the US (NotiSur, March 27, 2015) and when the northern superpower, after maintaining a stiff diplomatic and above all economic embargo against Cuba for more than a half century, has finally admitted that its policy failed and that it must begin normalizing bilateral relations with the island nation (NotiCen, Jan. 29, 2015).The decision also came just three weeks before the Seventh Summit of the Americas, an OASsponsored event that will be held in Panama City, Panama, April 10-11 and, for the first time since the periodic gatherings began in 1994, will involve Cuba.The OAS expelled Cuba from its ranks in 1962, keeping it at arm's length until 2009 (NotiCen, June 4, 2009).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.444
Threshold uncertainty score0.984

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUNM’s Digital Repository (University of New Mexico)Same topicEvolution and Paleontology StudiesFrench-language works237,207