Lower Red River and Lake Winnipeg South Basin Pathogen - Parasite Survey Report, Fall 2006
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary • 10 species of fish were targeted for collection, 60 fish per species were to be collected. • 9 ofthe 10 targeted species were successfully sampled. Only 7 channel catfish were captured. Total of 547 fish were screened for bacterial and viral pathogens of concern. • 60 lake whitefish were tested for the presence of Myxobolus cerebralis (causative agent of whirling disease). • There was no clinical evidence of disease suggestive of an infection with any bacterial and viral pathogens of concern in any of the fish examined. Lymphocystis and dermal sarcoma, both neoplasias having viral etiologies were observed in a small number of walleye and sauger. • Virus was not isolated from any of the samples received, nor were any bacterial pathogens of concern (e.g. Aeromonas salmonicida, causative agent offurunculosis, and Yersinia ruckeri, causative agent of enteric redmouth disease). • Myxobolus cerebralis was not detected in the lake whitefish sample. • The Winnipeg Fish Health Laboratory used the indirect fluorescent antibody technique to stain kidney smears to screen for the prescence of Rellibacterium salmollillarum (causative agent for bacterial kidney disease). The pathogen was not detected by this method in either the samples processed in the Winnipeg Fish Health Laboratory, nor the stained slide preparations received from the Bozeman Fish Health Center. The inter-laboratory exchange of material was undertaken to compare the results obtained in the two laboratories because distinctly different methods of detection for this pathogen were used in the respective laboratories.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".