La Convenzione di Pechino del 10 settembre 2010 sulla repressione di atti illeciti relativi all'aviazione civile internazionale
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Beijing Convention of September 10, 2010 on the suppression of unlawful acts relating to international civil aviation \n \nOn September 10th, 2010, the International Conference on Air Law held in Beijing under the auspices of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) adopted the Convention on the suppression of unlawful acts relating to international civil aviation and the Protocol supplementary to the Convention for the suppression of unlawful seizure of aircraft. \nThe essay offers an outline of the international regulation on aviation security from the Tokyo Convention of 1963 to the Montreal Convention of 1971 and an overview of the Beijing Convention of 2010, not yet in force. The author underlines the reasons of the adoption of the Beijing Convention and Protocol of 2010 which are related to the need to update the current international regulation on the suppression of unlawful acts relating to international civil aviation and deal with the new and emerging threats. Furthermore, the author focuses on relevant new offences relating to international civil aviation established by the new Convention. Moreover, the author points out positive and critical aspects of the Beijing Convention and considers its jurisdiction and applicability issues. With respect to the latter, the author underlines that the provisions of the Beijing Convention are not self-executing and therefore they will be enforced through what is known as the «indirect enforcement system» of international criminal law.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.007 | 0.011 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".