La ideología política en la enseñanza del español en la escuela de formación general en la Rusia estalinista (1947-1955)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present article deals with the analysis of the political ideology in teaching of Spanish in the school of general education in Soviet Russia of the stalinist era (1947-1955). With this purpose we have established the periodization by means of the analysis of legal documents, as well as official correspondence and press. After that, we analyzed the content of the series of official textbooks of Spanish designed for the use at school, paying attention to discursive strategies used for conveying the official Soviet ideology presented in the texts of the textbooks, in particular for representing the USSR, capitalist countries, Spain and Latin America. As a result, we have found that in the textbooks there is a clear opposition between the “good Us” (the communists, the socialists, the oppressed and exploited people) and the “bad Them” (the capitalists, the frankists etc.). This opposition is created by such discursive strategies as the glorification of the former and the criticism of the latter. Moreover, we have justified that the teaching of Spanish was oriented to the fomenting of the values of soviet patriotism and proletarian internationalism in the students, so that it used the cultural facts of the Spanish-speaking countries with the aim to cultivate the communist values in the students.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".