Kent kültürünün ve gazete haberlerinin karşılıklı etkileşimleri İstanbul ve madrid örnekleri
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Anahtar kelimeler\t: Kent, kent kültürü, küreselleşme, gazete haberleri, İspanya, Madrid, İstanbul, El País, El Mundo, Hürriyet, Zaman \n \nKENT KÜLTÜRÜNÜN VE GAZETE HABERLERİNİN KARŞILIKLI ETKİLEŞİMLERİ; İSTANBUL VE MADRİD ÖRNEKLERİ \n \nUygarlık, kentlerin doğuşuyla var olmuştur ve “uygarlığın beşiği” olarak anılan kentler ise tarih boyunca kültür üretmişlerdir. Kentler tarafından üretilen bu kültürün dağıtıcısı ise tarihsel olarak gazetelerdir. Nasıl ki; kent uygarlık demekse, gazete de kent kültürünün habercisidir. \nBu çalışma, “kent” ve “gazetecilik” arasındaki etkileşimi kavramanın ilk adımı olarak “kent kültürü” ve “gazete haberleri” arasındaki ilişkiye, Madrid ve İstanbul örnekleri üzerinden odaklanmıştır. Çalışma temel sorusu olan “Madrid ve İstanbul gazetelerinde kent kültürünün izleri var mı?” sorusuna, 2010 yılının El País, El Mundo, Hürriyet ve Zaman gazeteleri üzerinden içerik ve söylem analizi yardımıyla yanıt aranmıştır. Çalışmada varılan sonuç, Madrid’de gazetelerin kent kültürünü önemsediği ve fakat İstanbul’da kent kültürüne gazeteler tarafından yeterli özenin gösterilmediğidir. Bunun en önemli göstergelerinden biri Madrid gazetelerinin her gün, bağımsız bir gazete formatında kent çıkarırken, İstanbul gazetelerinin buna ihtiyaç duymamasıdır. \nKeywords\t\t\t: City, urban, urban culture, globalism, newspaper article, Spain, Madrid, Istanbul, El País, El Mundo, Hürriyet, Zaman \nABSTRACT \nINTRACTION OF URBAN CULTURE AND NEWS ARTICLES; CASES OF ISTANBUL AND MADRID \n \nCivilization came into being with the birth of cities and the cities that are labeled as the “cradles of civilization” have continuously generated culture throughout history. With a historical perspective, it is possible to assert that the distribution of this culture generated by cities has been carried out by newspapers. As much as the city signifies civilization, a newspaper is a messenger of urban culture. \nThis study, as the first step to comprehend the interaction between the “city” and “journalism”, has focused on the relationship between the “urban culture” and “newspaper articles” through the examples of Madrid and Istanbul. The study has sought answers for the core question “Are there any traces of urban culture in the newspapers of Madrid and Istanbul?” by making an analysis of the rhetoric and content of El País, El Mundo, Hürriyet and Zaman newspapers published throughout 2010. The conclusion of this study is that the newspapers in Madrid tend to regard the urban culture while the urban culture in Istanbul does not receive much attention from the press. One of the most visible signs of this situation is that the newspapers based in Madrid publish independent supplements focused on urban culture while those in Istanbul are not in need of that.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.063 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".