MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7039198264

Kent kültürünün ve gazete haberlerinin karşılıklı etkileşimleri İstanbul ve madrid örnekleri

2019· dissertation· tr· W7039198264 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMarmara University Open Access System · 2019
Typedissertation
Languagetr
FieldEngineering
TopicSpace Technology and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNewspaperUrban cultureUrban planningContext (archaeology)Quarter (Canadian coin)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Anahtar kelimeler\t: Kent, kent kültürü, küreselleşme, gazete haberleri, İspanya, Madrid, İstanbul, El País, El Mundo, Hürriyet, Zaman
\n
\nKENT KÜLTÜRÜNÜN VE GAZETE HABERLERİNİN KARŞILIKLI ETKİLEŞİMLERİ; İSTANBUL VE MADRİD ÖRNEKLERİ
\n
\nUygarlık, kentlerin doğuşuyla var olmuştur ve “uygarlığın beşiği” olarak anılan kentler ise tarih boyunca kültür üretmişlerdir. Kentler tarafından üretilen bu kültürün dağıtıcısı ise tarihsel olarak gazetelerdir. Nasıl ki; kent uygarlık demekse, gazete de kent kültürünün habercisidir.
\nBu çalışma, “kent” ve “gazetecilik” arasındaki etkileşimi kavramanın ilk adımı olarak “kent kültürü” ve “gazete haberleri” arasındaki ilişkiye, Madrid ve İstanbul örnekleri üzerinden odaklanmıştır. Çalışma temel sorusu olan “Madrid ve İstanbul gazetelerinde kent kültürünün izleri var mı?” sorusuna, 2010 yılının El País, El Mundo, Hürriyet ve Zaman gazeteleri üzerinden içerik ve söylem analizi yardımıyla yanıt aranmıştır. Çalışmada varılan sonuç, Madrid’de gazetelerin kent kültürünü önemsediği ve fakat İstanbul’da kent kültürüne gazeteler tarafından yeterli özenin gösterilmediğidir. Bunun en önemli göstergelerinden biri Madrid gazetelerinin her gün, bağımsız bir gazete formatında kent çıkarırken, İstanbul gazetelerinin buna ihtiyaç duymamasıdır.
\nKeywords\t\t\t: City, urban, urban culture, globalism, newspaper article, Spain, Madrid, Istanbul, El País, El Mundo, Hürriyet, Zaman
\nABSTRACT
\nINTRACTION OF URBAN CULTURE AND NEWS ARTICLES; CASES OF ISTANBUL AND MADRID
\n
\nCivilization came into being with the birth of cities and the cities that are labeled as the “cradles of civilization” have continuously generated culture throughout history. With a historical perspective, it is possible to assert that the distribution of this culture generated by cities has been carried out by newspapers. As much as the city signifies civilization, a newspaper is a messenger of urban culture. 
\nThis study, as the first step to comprehend the interaction between the “city” and “journalism”, has focused on the relationship between the “urban culture” and “newspaper articles” through the examples of Madrid and Istanbul. The study has sought answers for the core question “Are there any traces of urban culture in the newspapers of Madrid and Istanbul?” by making an analysis of the rhetoric and content of El País, El Mundo, Hürriyet and Zaman newspapers published throughout 2010. The conclusion of this study is that the newspapers in Madrid tend to regard the urban culture while the urban culture in Istanbul does not receive much attention from the press. One of the most visible signs of this situation is that the newspapers based in Madrid publish independent supplements focused on urban culture while those in Istanbul are not in need of that.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.354
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0090.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it