Mapping hydrate stability zones offshore Scotland
Bibliographic record
Abstract
One practical method to reduce environmentally damaging greenhouse gas emissions is through the geological storage of carbon dioxide. Deep, warm storage of carbon dioxide is currently taking place at Sleipner, North Sea and Weyburn, Canada. It is, however, also possible to store carbon dioxide as a liquid and hydrate in cool, sub-seabed sediments. Offshore north and west of Scotland seafloor pressures and temperatures are suitable for hydrate formation. In addition to the possibility of natural methane hydrate being present in this region, conditions may also be favourable for carbon dioxide storage as a liquid and hydrate. A computer program has been developed to calculate the depth to the base of the carbon dioxide and methane hydrate stability zones in two offshore regions: the Faeroe–Shetland Channel and the northern Rockall Trough. Results predict that methane hydrate remains stable to a maximum depth of 650 m below the seabed in the Faeroe–Shetland Channel, and 600 m below the seabed in the northern Rockall Trough; the carbon dioxide hydrate stability zone extends below the seabed to a depth of 345 and 280 m, respectively. No physical evidence for the existence of natural hydrate in these regions has been confirmed. Suitable conditions for carbon dioxide storage as a liquid and hydrate exist, and should this storage method be developed further, a more refined program and greater offshore investigations to improve data sets would be necessary to scope the full potential.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.037 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.009 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.061 | 0.016 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".