Music After The Cultural Revolution: Transnational Precarity For China's One-Child Generation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This dissertation studies the intergenerational effects of the Chinese Cultural Revolution and the transnational careers of Chinese musicians born and raised during the one-child policy. Bridging scholarship in ethnomusicology and musicology with work in cultural anthropology, East Asian studies, Asian American studies, and literature studies, I examine the palpable memories and traumas from the Cultural Revolution and show that they continually frame individual and collective engagements with music in the People’s Republic of China and the Chinese diaspora. At the core of this research are extensive multi-sited ethnography conducted in the PRC, Taiwan, Canada, and the United States, and archival sources. Using these interdisciplinary methodologies, I address Chinese music-making practices in relation to personal and familial desires, and national transformations. I argue that although some Chinese musicians have achieved the highest levels of institutional success through conservatory training and international performances, they are continually motivated by anxieties of socio-economic precarity and desires for redress from parents who lost musical ambitions during the Cultural Revolution. As a result, Chinese musicians use what I term “strategic citizenship” to create transnational opportunities and seek stable futures for themselves while navigating neoliberal systems that impact their educational pathways and possibilities for new residency in countries such as Canada and the United States.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".