MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7039674154

Multitaper Statistical Tests for the Detection of Frequency-Modulated Signals

2020· dissertation· en· W7039674154 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueQSpace (Queen's University Library) · 2020
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicDiatoms and Algae Research
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNoise (video)NucleofectionSulfinpyrazoneHyporeflexiaTubulopathyDysgeusia
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Detection of periodic signals in noise is an important problem in many scientific fields and there exist tools in the multitaper spectrum estimation and harmonic analysis framework for doing so, for example, the Harmonic F statistic. However, the Harmonic F statistic can lose effectiveness under certain types of frequency modulation, when the signal to noise ratio is low, and when the background spectrum is highly coloured. In his 2009 paper, "Polynomial Phase Demodulation in Multitaper Analysis," Thomson proposed methods for dealing with time series data (specifically, solar data) where these problems are present. In this thesis we propose an extension of this work to deal with the detection of frequency modulated signals. The method uses the Slepian sequences as projection filters to reconstruct the series based on a 2W band around a given carrier frequency and then tests the
\ninstantaneous frequency series for a low-degree polynomial form in that band using the Slepians combined with an associated family of polynomials in a variance ratio test statistic. Under the null hypothesis that there are no sinusoidal signals with polynomial frequency modulation at the given carrier frequency, these test statistics are approximately distributed according to an F distribution with degrees of freedom depending on the number of tapers used and the degree of the polynomial being tested. We compare several such test statistics via simulation studies and apply them
\nto a solar time series from the GOLF SoHO instrument.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQSpace (Queen's University Library)Same topicDiatoms and Algae ResearchFrench-language works237,207