MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7039767439

Nanostructured carbon-based materials for electrochemical applications

2020· dissertation· en· W7039767439 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

Venuee-scholar@UOIT (University of Ontario Institute of Technology) · 2020
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicStudy of Mite Species
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMesoporous materialCarbonizationAnnealing (glass)OverpotentialCatalysisPolymerCarbon fibersDissolutionElectrocatalyst
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mesoporous carbons have been widely studied due to the relevance of these materials for applications in energy storage and conversion devices (batteries, supercapacitors, and fuel cells), mainly due to their high surface area, tunable pore distribution, and good electrical conductivity. Though carbon is chemically stable, mesoporous carbons used in fuel cells are susceptible to corrosion when exposed to high positive overpotential in acid media that result in dissolution and agglomeration of valuable noble catalyst nanoparticles. In this thesis, high-surface-area mesoporous carbons (~ 600 to 1000 cm2/g) were obtained by carbonization of resorcinol formaldehyde (RF) polymer gels; using poly-diallyl methylammonium chloride and SiO2 (~200 nm diameter) as soft- and hard-template, respectively, to tailor the textural properties of the carbon products. Accelerated ageing tests on platinized samples prepared with mesoporous carbons exposed to different annealing treatments showed a significant improvement in stability after annealing for two hours at 1500oC, over performing an in-house prepared Pt/ Vulcan carbon reference sample. The deposition of TiO2 on carbon was also intended to improve the catalyst/substrate stability at lower annealing temperatures, some preliminary results are also presented in the thesis. Overall, the thesis has contributed to the implementation of a flexible methodology for the synthesis of organic polymer gels and carbon gels, that it is expected will contribute to the development of novel heteroatom-doped carbons and non-precious metal catalyst materials for renewable energy, photo- and electrocatalysis, sensors, environmental remediation, and waste treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuee-scholar@UOIT (University of Ontario Institute of Technology)Same topicStudy of Mite SpeciesFrench-language works237,207