Bibliographic record
Abstract
This output comprises a six-minute short film 'practice as research output' which extends Crofts published research on Angela Carter's feminist reappropriation of Red Riding Hood in the short story (1979), radio (1980) and film adaptations (1984) of 'The Company of Wolves' and their reception by feminist critics and scholars (see Crofts 1999, 2003), with a contextualising article reflecting on this piece as an example of film practice as research, 'Bluebell, Short Film and Feminist Film Practice as Research: Strategies for Dissemination and Peer Review', Journal of Media Practice (2007), 8:1, pp 7-24 (http://www.intellectbooks.co.uk/journalarticles.php?issn=14682753&v=8&i=1&d=10.1386/jmpr.8.1.7_1 DOI: 10.1386/jmpr.8.1.7_1). The DVD was acquired by the library of the University of Technology, Sydney (UTS); a Digital Betacam master acquired by BFI Archive (http://ftvdb.bfi.org.uk/sift/title/824394); cited on Internet Movie Database (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0940665/); and collected in ScreenWork a peer-reviewed DVD of academic screen media practice research published in association with Journal of Media Practice (http://www.bristol.ac.uk/drama/staff_research/screenwork/crofts.html). Two 'contextualising' DVD versions are provided: (i) the Screenwork collection, and (ii) the DVD provided for UTS, Sydney, which provides further research context. \n \nThe film has been screened at numerous international film festivals in the UK, Ireland, Italy and the US and papers presented at international conferences in the UK, Portugal and Canada, leading to invited research seminars at presentation at the Peer Review and Dissemination Journal of Media Practice Symposium, Salford June 2006 and the Centre for Media Research Seminar, University of Ulster, November 2006 and visiting lecture at University College Plymouth, Saint Mark and Saint John (Oct 2007).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.076 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".