MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7042089691

Palestine in Westphalian Worldmaking: The Production of the OPT as a Place through International Humanitarian-Developmental Governance

2025· article· en· W7042089691 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueScholars Commons (Wilfrid Laurier University) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicJewish and Middle Eastern Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWestphalian sovereigntyCorporate governanceSovereigntyGlobal governanceGood governanceSustainable developmentPoliticsProduction (economics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This multiple manuscript dissertation examines the international governance of the Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT)—a non-sovereign territory— undertaken by an assemblage of actors doing both humanitarian and development work. The study puts forward the theoretical and methodological framework of place-making to analyze the effects of the long-term governance of the OPT under the umbrella of humanitarian service provision and external ‘state-building’ development interventions. This dissertation argues that the long-term international governance of the OPT, even though mandated to be apolitical, acts as an interpellator of place. The production of place or place-making through the overlapping discourses of humanitarianism and sustainable development situates the OPT as part of the Westphalian system where otherwise it exists outside sovereignty and the attendant protection of human rights. Place-making is an effect rather than an intended policy. Nonetheless, it is an important by-product of international governance as it highlights how governance actors as agents of the Westphalian structure are limited by the constraints placed on them but also counter these by mobilizing the more universal (and less contentious) policies and frameworks to advocate for deeply political issues. The dissertation analyzes the use of the Sustainable Development Framework in the policy literature of UN agencies and other development actors working in the OPT as a heuristic of place-making. The use of the SDG language in policy documents since 2015 illustrate a blending of the conventionally siloed humanitarian and developmental aspects of intervention. Instead of a technical assessment of the SDG implementation, the dissertation focuses on the implications this has on solving the problem of invisibility faced by the stateless Palestinian population of the OPT. By mobilizing the SDGs, international governance positions this population as valuable lives deserving of rights just like other ‘full citizens.’ In assessing the relevance of the SDGs through the lens of place-making, the dissertation illustrates the management of the long interim of the transition of OPT. In the absence of sovereignty, frameworks like the SDGs help to underline the inherent deservingness of the Palestinian population in the OPT and hence acts, as it were, a discourse of inclusion. Further, the dissertation highlights that while the SDGs help to visiblize the OPT, the goals are also used in the foreign donor led state-building interventions through which the infrastructure of Palestinian statehood is funded by countries like Canada, even as its realization is interminably deferred through their foreign policy actions. This reveals a reinforcement of statist place-making onto the OPT, disregarding the structural conditions that disallow it. These arguments have implications for how we understand statelessness as more than absence of legal identity, the use of global public policies in the context of entrenched statelessness and the political horizons and futurity of the OPT in the Westphalian system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.779
Threshold uncertainty score0.968

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScholars Commons (Wilfrid Laurier University)Same topicJewish and Middle Eastern StudiesFrench-language works237,207