MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7042380976

Pretreatment Alternatives for the Ultrafiltration of Algae Laden Water

2020· dissertation· en· W7042380976 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Atrium (University of Guelph) · 2020
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAlgebraic Geometry and Number Theory
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUltrafiltration (renal)FoulingOrganic matterMembraneMembrane foulingAlgaeDissolved organic carbonDivalent
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The excessive growth of algae from eutrophication as a result of human activities is one of the most serious problems in drinking water treatment. During algae blooms, the excessive release of algae organic matter (AOM) changes the organic matter distributions in surface waters causing severe membrane fouling. Comparisons of the fouling of UF membranes treating surface waters with different natural organic matter (NOM) distributions were done to identify the organic fractions that cause membrane fouling. The waters tested were prepared by combining NOM from Lake Ontario with AOM from four algae species (Chlorella sp., Microcystis aeruginosa, Merismopedia sp., and Cyclotella sp.) commonly found in freshwater. Liquid chromatography-organic carbon detector (LC-OCD) and fluorescence excitation-emission matrix (FEEM) analytical techniques were used to characterize the organic fractions. The membrane fouling was attributed to the hydrophilic fraction of NOM, especially to biopolymer-polysaccharides and proteins as characterized via LC-OCD, and predominant FEEM responses from protein-like and SMP-like substances. The fouling behaviors of the organic fractions were influenced by the addition of natural occurring divalent and metal cations at different doses and pHs. The membrane treating waters with high content of polysaccharides and proteins experienced the highest membrane fouling and membrane resistances. The increase in membrane fouling was attributed to their absorption within the membranes. The addition of divalent cations decreased the membrane fouling as a result of their complexation with AOM. Higher membrane fouling was observed as pH decreased. At pH 6, the membrane experienced the lowest organic matter retention, especially biopolymers and protein-like substances. This was attributable to charge neutralization and reduced electrostatic attraction with the membranes. At pH 8.0, the increase in electrostatic repulsion facilitated the formation of looser layers that led to higher retention of biopolymers and protein-like substances. The fouling behaviors of the organic fractions were compared using sedimentation and dissolved air flotation (DAF) as pre-treatment and influenced by the addition of aluminum and iron-based coagulants. Sedimentation produced better effluent quality than DAF. Membrane fouling decreased with the addition of coagulants, especially aluminum based. Waters with higher biopolymer contents were more susceptible to coagulation achieving higher organic matter removal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Atrium (University of Guelph)Same topicAlgebraic Geometry and Number TheoryFrench-language works237,207