Bibliographic record
Abstract
Magaz1ne ornossusIn 1902, the junior class of Fairmount College decided that a permanent record should be kept of their college life.Why was the book entitled Parnassus?When looki ng out across the city of Wichita from an elevated altitude you can plainly distinguish WSU .We're on a hill.This re minded our founders of the legendary Parnassus Mountain range of Greece, which was the home of Apollo and the nine daughters of Zeus and Mnemosyne."And since that Greek God and the Goddesses personified the highest in intellectual and arti stic aspirations while retaining a vibrant love of life, what better comparison could be drawn for a university?",wrote a previous Parnassus editor.And now, 71 years later, the purpose of Parnassus is still to record campus life, but everyth ing changes with time including the Parnassus.The concept behind the present change is to provide versati lity in the style and format of the publication while attempting to preserve the highlights of a year at WSU.The fall issue of Parnassus serves as a personal record of your existence on campus and recaptures your escaping youth through student photos.The spring issue will recapture the mood and spirit of your campus life through feature articles and editorials.It is our hope that these issues will act as a catalyst to jar and stimulate your memory as you try to recapture your 1973-74 experience.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".