PENGARUH RELIGIUSITAS DAN SELF-EFFICACY TERHADAP \nQUARTER LIFE CRISIS PADA MAHASISWA TINGKAT AKHIR UIN \nSAYYID ALI RAHMATULLAH TULUNGAGUNG
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Studi ini bermaksud untuk melihat pengaruh religiusitas dan self-efficacy pada \nquarter life crisis yang tengah dirasakan mahasiswa tingkat akhir. Responden dalam \npenelitian ini adalah mahasiswa tingkat akhir UIN Sayyid Ali Rahmatullah \nTulungagung. Responden penelitian sebanyak 323 responden yang berusia di \nsekitar 20-24 tahunan. Sampel penelitian diambil menggunakan teknik dengan jenis \nnon-probability sampling dengan kriteria responden yaitu mahasiswa tingkat akhir \nangkatan 2019 UIN Sayyid Ali Rahmatullah Tulungagung. Instrumen yang \ndikenakan ialah skala religiusitas, skala self-efficacy, dan skala quarter life crisis \nyang telah dinyatakan valid dan reliabel. Data diuji dan dialalisis menggunakan uji \nasumsi klasik dan analisis regresi linear berganda dengan uji hipotesis uji t parsial \ndan uji F simultan. Hasil studi menunjukkan religiusitas dan self-efficacy secara \nsimultan berpengaruh signifikan terhadap quarter life cricis dengan nilai F hitung \n57,423 > F tabel 3,00 dengan Sig. 0,00 < 0,05 dan presentase keberpengaruhan \nsebesar 26,4%. Nilai koefisien regresi religiusitas -0,382 dan self-efficacy -0,950, \nhal tersebut berarti bahwa variabel religiusitas dan self-efficacy berpengaruh negatif \nterhadap quarter life crisis, berarti apabila terjadi peningkatan religiusitas dan self- \nefficacy maka tingkat quarter life crisis akan menurun. Hasil analisis presentase \nkeberpengaruhan tiap variabel didapatkan nilai presentase pengaruh negatif \nterhadap quarter life crisis sebesar 6,9% pada variabel religiusitas dan 19,6% pada \nvariabel self-efficacy. \nKata Kunci: religiusitas; efikasi diri; quarter life crisis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".