MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7042695484

Professor David Flynn is jumping at the chance to study this booming state

2014· article· en· W7042695484 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUND Scholarly Commons (University of North Dakota) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicSocioeconomics of Resources and Conservation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPopulationState (computer science)Government (linguistics)Circumstantial evidenceGloomHeadline
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Professor David Flynn is jumping at the chance to study this booming state North Dakota: It's more than just oil. That's why folks like David Flynn, a University of North Dakota professor of economics, are jumping at the chance to study this booming state. As the head of the Bureau of Business and Economic Research, Flynn is researching the oil boom and other factors that could have long-lasting effects on the North Dakota economy, population and housing. "Economists have gotten the reputation of being the bearers of bad news," said Flynn. He knows that the black gold won't make the economy stay booming forever. Like all booms, Flynn predicts this too will eventually slow as a result of growing too much too fast. Most media attention is directed toward the oil boom; however, Flynn recognizes there are many subtle factors at play. The state's agricultural growth and the expansion of the retail sector from Canadian traffic helped spur the economy. North Dakota also stayed above the red because it was one of the few states in which banks did not participate in subprime mortgage loans. These loans were deemed a major factor in the 2008 recession. There is no question that the oil boom has caused people to flock to the state in search of jobs. The question on economists' minds is whether or not this population growth will be sustainable. That is precisely why Flynn has turned his attention to studying local businesses. He is curious to know if bringing additional services and businesses to towns near the oil fields will give these temporary residents a reason to stay. In another study, Flynn and a colleague from the University of Nebraska-Omaha picked South Dakota as a central meeting point to observe the survival of rural businesses there. Through their research, they found that rural businesses in South Dakota seem to survive more than urban businesses in particular sectors for reasons they are still investigating. When not knee-deep in research, Flynn discusses the changes in North Dakota's economy with his students. "The growth has made for an interesting case study for population and forecasting topics as a positive spot in the U.S. economy," said Flynn. Flynn teaches courses in economic forecasting, statistics, banking and bank regulations, and population analysis. He enjoys being able to integrate lectures with topics he is currently studying. Because of Flynn's research, UND is getting an up-close look at the state's changes and students are getting hands-on experience in the field of economics. How long will North Dakota keep booming? That's hard to say. Rest assured economists like Flynn have their nose to the grindstone, eager to find out. Kate Menzies University & Public Affairs student writer

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.147
Threshold uncertainty score0.858

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUND Scholarly Commons (University of North Dakota)Same topicSocioeconomics of Resources and ConservationFrench-language works237,207