MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7042757494

Race, indigeneity and the Baden-Powell Girl Guides: Age, gender and the British world, 1908-1920

2015· other· en· W7042757494 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueGreenwich Academic Literature Archive (University of Greenwich) · 2015
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGirlIndigenousEthnic groupFourth WorldAgency (philosophy)World War IIPolitics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article examines the international reach, and levels of inclusiveness, of the Baden Powell Girl Guides from the formal establishment of the Boy Scout movement in 1908 to the end of the First World War. On the one hand, it shows how young women were able to exercise agency in the founding of new patrols and companies. It also analyses the differential inclusion of indigenous peoples within the ‘Global South’. Whereas in Malaysia, ethnically mixed companies were the norm, in some African countries, black girls were excluded. In India, however, both segregated and mixed companies existed. The First World War provided opportunities for girls of different races and ethnicities to contribute, not only through gendered activities, but to attain a new, public, role through performance and philanthropy.In contrast with recent representations of the largest youth movement of the twentieth century, as fundamentally exclusive, this article demonstrates the how differing levels of engagement of indigenous girls and young women.
\n
\nThis chapter originated in a paper presented to the Leverhulme Trust funded project "Approaching War: Childhood, Culture and the First World War", (2011-2013) which held conferences in Sydney, Toronto and Newcastle, UK. This was one of the first international projects to mark the centenary of the First World War. The author was invited to chair a discussion panel at the second conference, in Toronto, “in conversation” with two Canadian children's authors, Arthur Slade and Hugh Brewster (https://brocku.ca/news/19668), as well as presenting at the Newcastle conference. I was also given a swathe of children's books published in Canada which have been used extensively in teaching Children's Literature to Greenwich students. 
\n
\n(See http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1179/1758571614Z.00000000014)
\n
\nThe volume in which the paper has been published derives from another international conference, "Children, Childhood and the British World", held at King's College London, in July 2013. The convenors and editors both have specialisms in Australian history: Simon Sleight is currently acting Director of the Menzies Centre for Australian Studies at King's College, London, while Dr Shirleene Robinson is Vice-Chancellor's Innovation Fellow in History at Macquarie University in Sydney. The chapter authors are based in the US, Australia, Canada, and South Africa, and the volume marks the increased interest in the history of children in international context.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.135
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.011
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0020.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGreenwich Academic Literature Archive (University of Greenwich)French-language works237,207