Principles of Ethical Métis Research
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Principles of Ethical Métis ResearchResearch comes with an inherent responsibility.It is important that researchers adhere to and apply a high level of scientific and ethical standards.This ensures the protection of both the research participants and the researcher.Métis have different experiences of research than First Nations or Inuit, but there is very little information on research ethics specific to Métis.The concept of Métis-specific health research, practiced in a way where Métis people are consulted and involved in the research, has really only emerged in the last two decades.There is little evidence or documentation around the use of Métisspecific research ethical guidelines or principles.Métis-specific means that the focus of an activity or program is on Métis communities, and is consistent with the needs and unique cultural perspective of Métis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.150 | 0.170 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.034 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.021 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.013 | 0.021 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".