QUARTER LIFE CRISIS DITINJAU DARI KESEPIAN DAN EFIKASI DIRI PADA MAHASISWA TINGKAT AKHIR
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The transition from adolescence to early adulthood creates a different response for each individual because of the various demands and problems that occur during this period or what is called emerging adulthood. This study aims to determine the relationship between loneliness, self-efficacy and quarter life crisis in final year of undergraduate students in Yogyakarta. The method in this research is correlational quantitative. Subjects in this study amounted to 168 students obtained by technique accidental sampling. In this study, three measurement tools were used, namely the Loneliness Scale, the Self-efficacy Scale and the Quarter Life Crisis Scale. Data analysis using multiple linear regression analysis methods. The hypothesis test shows that there is a simultaneous significant relationship between loneliness, self-efficacy and quarter life crisis. This is indicated by the significance value of p=0.000 (p<0.05) so that H1 in this study is accepted. Meanwhile, the effective contribution of loneliness and self-efficacy variables was 32.6%. This research can present the condition of final year of undergraduate students who experience a quarter life crisis so that the result of this study can be used as an evaluation both to universities and students themselves.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".