Relationship between product based loyalty and clustering based on supermarket visit and spending patterns
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Loyalty of customers to a supermarket can be measured in a variety of ways. If a customer \ntends to buy from certain categories of products, it is likely that the customer is loyal to the \nsupermarket. Another indication of loyalty is based on the tendency of customers to visit the \nsupermarket over a number of weeks. Regular visitors and spenders are more likely to be loyal \nto the supermarket. Neither one of these two criteria can provide a complete picture of \ncustomers’ loyalty. The decision regarding the loyalty of a customer will have to take into \naccount the visiting pattern as well as the categories of products purchased. This paper \ndescribes results of experiments that attempted to identify customer loyalty using thes e two \nsets of criteria separately. The experiments were based on transactional data obtained from a \nsupermarket data collection program. Comparisons of results from these parallel sets of \nexperiments were useful in fine tuning both the schemes of estimating the degree of loyalty of \na customer. The project also provides useful insights for the development of more sophisticated \nmeasures for studying customer loyalty. It is hoped that the understanding of loyal customers \nwill be helpful in identifying better marketing strategies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".