MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7043045421

Speaking out: Class, race, and gender in the writings of Ruth McEnery Stuart, Edith Summers Kelley, and Harriette Simpson Arnow

2008· article· en· W7043045421 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Media Literacy Education · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAmerican and British Literature Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEthnic groupWhite (mutation)NegotiationPeriod (music)World War IIQuarter (Canadian coin)Social orderOrder (exchange)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study analyzes representations in American fiction of social issues during periods of national turmoil. Ruth McEnery Stuart, Edith Summers Kelley, and Harriette Simpson Arnow draw characters marginalized by class, gender, race, and ethnicity who negotiate survival amid crisis and adverse socioeconomic conditions. Giving voice to people who could not speak for themselves, the texts perform the work of cultural resistance to a discourse that privileges capitalism, patriarchy, and white supremacy while oppressing the poor, women, and non-whites. Following an introductory chapter, I present the authors and their works chronologically, beginning each chapter with a brief overview of the historical moment to which that author responds. The literary analyses that follow examine the details of daily life as represented in the texts in order to study how these works speak to and are produced by their cultural moments. Chapter Two summarizes ever-evolving interpretations of Reconstruction and analyzes writings by Stuart, a southern writer from the late nineteenth century. Subversively using humor, dialect, and a broad range of characters, she cuts across lines of class, race, gender, and ethnicity to challenge social barriers. The third chapter reviews the Progressive Era, a period known for social reforms and technological advances. Analysis of Kelley's 1923 Weeds, set in a remote Appalachian community during World War I, exposes the impact of economic, biological, and social forces on women's lives. Chapter Four begins with an overview of the quarter century after World War I, including the Depression and the Second World War. Arnow's 1954 The Dollmaker is analyzed for the effects of dislocation and economic insufficiency on the life and spirit of a woman who migrates with her family from Appalachia to the industrial wartime city of Detroit. The literature in this study is specifically American and is strongly connected to place. Though it enjoyed initial critical acclaim, it is currently marginalized outside the canonical mainstream. Because they speak for members of our society whose hardscrabble lives, while difficult to confront, form an integral part of our national mosaic, these works merit reconsideration for American Studies and examinations of race, working-class issues, and women's concerns.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.630
Threshold uncertainty score0.335

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it