Relation and change over time of CN-ratios throughout Swedish peatlands and in seven fertility classes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Peat covered areas makes up about one quarter of the total Swedish land area \nand are composed of accumulated organic material that can reach great depths. \nNowadays, they are a valuable resource for man due to its many applications and \nfunctions. In Europe they are disappearing at an accelerated rate due to the increasing \ndemands for energy, agriculture, horticulture and forestry. \n \nThe purpose of this work was to observe the CN-ratio proprieties and trends for \npeatlands during the last 30 years and throughout different regions of Sweden. Included \nwere C/N values observed within a specific fertility classification to see \nhow they correlated with the different fertility classes. For the purpose, three soil \ndatasets (1983-87; 1993-98; 2003-08) were used. \n \nIt was observed as expected that the CN-ratios were low in the more fertile \nclasses and high on the less fertile ones. However, there were no noticeable CNratio \ntrends throughout the years. Within the different regions of Sweden the results \nwere contradicting the expectations, since the C/N values were lower in the \nnorth than in the south of Sweden, as opposed to the N deposition values, which \nare much higher in the south than in the north.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".