The relationships between DNA methylation levels and chorionicity in newborn twins
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Monozygotic (MZ) twins are currently used in epigenetic studies as one homogenous group. However, there are two MZ twin types: dichorionic (DC) and monochorionic (MC). We hypothesize that DCMZ twins are more similar epigenetically, compared to MCMZ twins, due to earlier zygote splitting, a higher degree of birth outcome similarity, or both. We recruited 220 newborn twins and obtained genome-wide DNA methylation profiles for 48 twins. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and linear mixed models were used to investigate the relationships between DNA methylation levels and chorionicity. DCMZ twins tended to have longer gestational age, larger birth weight, and smaller birth length discordance. DCMZ twins had more similar DNA methylation profiles than MCMZ twins (ICC=0.21 vs. 0.13), after adjusting for birth outcomes. Additionally, we identified 5,170 CpG sites with different DNA methylation levels between DCMZ and MCMZ twins. This study highlights the importance of incorporating chorionicity information in epigenetic twin studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".